Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4

2005-07-11 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 09 July 2005 13:07, Russell King wrote: > On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 01:01:33PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > diff -puN arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c~uml-fix-for-gcc4-lvalue > > arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c --- > > linux-2.6.git/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c~uml-fix-for-gcc4-lvalue 2005

Re: [patch 1/1] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4

2005-07-09 Thread Russell King
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 01:01:33PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > diff -puN arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c~uml-fix-for-gcc4-lvalue > arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c > --- linux-2.6.git/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c~uml-fix-for-gcc4-lvalue > 2005-07-09 13:01:03.0 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.git-paolo/

[patch 1/1] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4

2005-07-09 Thread blaisorblade
This construct is refused by GCC 4, so here's the fix. Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.git-paolo/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c~uml-fix-for-gcc4-lvalue