On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 08:46:15PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 29 August 2005 19:45, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> >
> > Bob did this part (forgot to CC him, oops). But I believe it's needed
> > for setting traps so much earlier.
>
> Ok looking again I guess he needed it for the GDT access in cpu
On Monday 29 August 2005 19:45, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> Bob did this part (forgot to CC him, oops). But I believe it's needed
> for setting traps so much earlier.
Ok looking again I guess he needed it for the GDT access in cpu_init
> > > + if (notify_die(DIE_PAGE_FAULT, "no context", regs, error_co
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 07:13:47PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 29 August 2005 18:10, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > +void __init early_setup_per_cpu_area(void)
> > +{
> > + static char cpu0[PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM]
> > + __attribute__ ((aligned (SMP_CACHE_BYTES)));
> > + char *ptr = cpu0;
On Monday 29 August 2005 18:10, Tom Rini wrote:
> +void __init early_setup_per_cpu_area(void)
> +{
> + static char cpu0[PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM]
> + __attribute__ ((aligned (SMP_CACHE_BYTES)));
> + char *ptr = cpu0;
> +
> + cpu_pda[0].data_offset = ptr - __per_cpu_start;
> +
This adds support for the x86_64 architecture. In addition to what was noted
in the core-lite patch about stuff outside of new files, we add -g0 to
compiling of syscalls.o as otherwise we run into problems when debugging
modules, and like i386 annotate switch_to().
---
linux-2.6.13-trini/arch/
5 matches
Mail list logo
