On Fri, 18 May 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Do we need *this*? (compare procfs)
>
> I believe that shmfs's inodes remain "more" in memory than those of
> procfs. That is, procfs ones can find their way out (we can regenerate
> it), while shmfs/tmpfs/ramfs/etc. should not do that (we'd lose the
>
On May 18 2007 11:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Index: slub/mm/shmem.c
>===
>--- slub.orig/mm/shmem.c 2007-05-18 00:54:30.0 -0700
>+++ slub/mm/shmem.c2007-05-18 01:02:26.0 -0700
Do we need *this*? (compare
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
mm/shmem.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: slub/mm/shmem.c
===
--- slub.orig/mm/shmem.c2007-05-18 00:54:30.0 -0700
3 matches
Mail list logo
