Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-31 Thread Shailabh Nagar
Paul Jackson wrote: Diego wrote: I bet I'm not the only one here who can't understand it either. You're not alone. See an email thread entitled: Classes: 1) what are they, 2) what is their name? http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5328162&forum_id=35191 on the ckrm-

Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-30 Thread Gerrit Huizenga
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:32:32 PST, Paul Jackson wrote: > A question for the CKRM developers: > > What middleware packages, outside the kernel, exist or are > in the works that will rely on CKRM? Primarily, CKRM classes can be instantiated today by simple echo's into the /rcfs files

Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-30 Thread Paul Jackson
Diego wrote: > I bet I'm not the only one here > who can't understand it either. You're not alone. See an email thread entitled: Classes: 1) what are they, 2) what is their name? http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5328162&forum_id=35191 on the ckrm-tech@lists.so

Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-30 Thread Chandra Seetharaman
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:55:05PM +0200, Diego Calleja wrote: > El Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:05:30 -0800, > Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > > worth having. I for one am a CKRM skeptic, so won't be much help to you > > in that quest. Good luck. > > > > I don't see any performance nu

Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-30 Thread Diego Calleja
El Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:29:53 -0800, Gerrit Huizenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > been under so much revision lately. However, resource utilization at the > priority level does not allow you to say "OpenOffice can have up to 30% > of my CPU, my email client is guaranteed to get at least 5%, and

Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-30 Thread Shailabh Nagar
Diego Calleja wrote: El Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:05:30 -0800, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: worth having. I for one am a CKRM skeptic, so won't be much help to you in that quest. Good luck. I don't see any performance numbers, either on small systems, or scalability on large systems. Ce

Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-30 Thread Gerrit Huizenga
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:55:05 +0200, Diego Calleja wrote: > El Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:05:30 -0800, > Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi=F3: > > > > worth having. I for one am a CKRM skeptic, so won't be much help to you > > in that quest. Good luck. > > > > I don't see any performance number

Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-30 Thread Diego Calleja
El Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:05:30 -0800, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > worth having. I for one am a CKRM skeptic, so won't be much help to you > in that quest. Good luck. > > I don't see any performance numbers, either on small systems, or > scalability on large systems. Certainly t

Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-30 Thread Diego Calleja
El Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:05:30 -0800, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > worth having. I for one am a CKRM skeptic, so won't be much help to you > in that quest. Good luck. > > I don't see any performance numbers, either on small systems, or > scalability on large systems. Certainly t

Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-30 Thread Chandra Seetharaman
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:25:44AM -0800, Gerrit Huizenga wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:53:19 PST, Dave Hansen wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:03 -0800, Gerrit Huizenga wrote: > > > The code provides a fairly simple mechanism for adding controllers for > > > any resource type > > > > Last

Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-30 Thread Gerrit Huizenga
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:53:19 PST, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:03 -0800, Gerrit Huizenga wrote: > > The code provides a fairly simple mechanism for adding controllers for > > any resource type > > Last time I saw the memory controller, it was 3000 lines. Doesn't seem > too simpl

Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-30 Thread Dave Hansen
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:03 -0800, Gerrit Huizenga wrote: > The code provides a fairly simple mechanism for adding controllers for > any resource type Last time I saw the memory controller, it was 3000 lines. Doesn't seem too simple to me. :) Can you post some of the additional controllers that

Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-29 Thread Gerrit Huizenga
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:05:30 PST, Paul Jackson wrote: > gerrit wrote: > > This is the core patch set for CKRM > > Welcome. Hi Paul. > Newcomers to CKRM might want to start reading these patches with "[patch > 8/8] CKRM: Documentation". Starting with patch 0/8 or 1/8 will be > difficult, at

Re: [patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-29 Thread Paul Jackson
gerrit wrote: > This is the core patch set for CKRM Welcome. Newcomers to CKRM might want to start reading these patches with "[patch 8/8] CKRM: Documentation". Starting with patch 0/8 or 1/8 will be difficult, at least if you're as dimm witted as I am. Even the documentation included in patch

[patch 0/8] CKRM: Core patch set

2005-03-29 Thread gh
-- This is the core patch set for CKRM, review comments almost all applied (there are a few we are still working on, mostly cosmetic). However, this set has been extensively regression tested on IA32, x86-64/EM64T, and PPC64, with various CKRM CONFIG options on and off and both regression tests an