On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 10:11:28PM +, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> > Second attempt. The linux-kernel list is broken at the moment (reported
> > fault to postmaster already) so some messages get lost at random:
>
>Tigran has local problems with his o
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 10:11:28PM +, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Second attempt. The linux-kernel list is broken at the moment (reported
> fault to postmaster already) so some messages get lost at random:
Tigran has local problems with his outgoing email.
Nothing to do with vger.kernel.or
Second attempt. The linux-kernel list is broken at the moment (reported
fault to postmaster already) so some messages get lost at random:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 21:49:21 + (GMT)
From: Tigran Aivazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTEC
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, fair enough. Let me make a new statement then: I suggest we preface
> > > these with MSR_ anyway so we can tell what they really are.
> > >
> >
> > That is much
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> > OK, fair enough. Let me make a new statement then: I suggest we preface
> > these with MSR_ anyway so we can tell what they really are.
> >
>
> That is much better. Actually, I accept your suggestion. (because I have
>
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> > >
> > > > Please call these MSR_* instead, "IA32_*" isn't very descriptive,
> > > > besides, the preferred prefix in existing locations in the Linux
> > > > kernel is "X86_", e.g. X86_EFLAGS_IF or X86_
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Please call these MSR_* instead, "IA32_*" isn't very descriptive,
> > besides, the preferred prefix in existing locations in the Linux
> > kernel is "X86_", e.g. X86_EFLAGS_IF or X86_CR4_PSE. I think there
>
> I think I agree with Tigran's naming. These are IA32 registers
On 1 Dec 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > +/* symbolic names for some interesting MSRs */
> > +#define IA32_PLATFORM_ID 0x17
> > +#define IA32_UCODE_WRITE 0x79
> > +#define IA32_UCODE_REV 0x8B
> >
>
> Please call these MSR_* instead, "IA32_*" isn't very descriptive,
> besides, the
> Please call these MSR_* instead, "IA32_*" isn't very descriptive,
> besides, the preferred prefix in existing locations in the Linux
> kernel is "X86_", e.g. X86_EFLAGS_IF or X86_CR4_PSE. I think there
I think I agree with Tigran's naming. These are IA32 registers not X86 ones ;)
-
To unsubs
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Tigran Aivazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Second attempt -- the first one got lost due to some local mail client
> problems...
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> Here is the patch to microcode update driver to support the new P4
> CPU.
Second attempt -- the first one got lost due to some local mail client
problems...
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 11:43:10 + (GMT)
From: Tigran Aivazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [patch-2.4.0-test12
11 matches
Mail list logo
