Hi Greg,
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> This feels to me like a "feature addition", and as such, I don't think
> it is aplicable for the .23-stable tree.
It's an ABI regression (slabtop, for example, doesn't work) when
CONFIG_SLUB is enabled.
Pekka
--
To unsubscrib
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:28:10PM +0200, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [ Upstream commits: 57ed3eda977a215f054102b460ab0eb5d8d112e6,
> 6b6adc22a01941165d5af9a3e69e28e948b28f47, and
> 158a962422e4a54dc256b6a9b9562f3d30d34d9c ]
>
> This adds a read-only /pr
From: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ Upstream commits: 57ed3eda977a215f054102b460ab0eb5d8d112e6,
6b6adc22a01941165d5af9a3e69e28e948b28f47, and
158a962422e4a54dc256b6a9b9562f3d30d34d9c ]
This adds a read-only /proc/slabinfo file on SLUB, that makes slabtop work.
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED]: build
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> this is the part I'm not very thrilled about... at least on first sight
> it looks like a user can now hold the read sem over system calls, and
> for as long as it wants.
No, you misunderstand how seq-files work.
The start/stop sequence is done
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:23:28 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [...] doesn't a patch to provide /proc/slabinfo for SLUB already
> > exist?
>
> yes, the complete (and tested) patch is below. It has been through a
> few thousand rando
* Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] doesn't a patch to provide /proc/slabinfo for SLUB already
> exist?
yes, the complete (and tested) patch is below. It has been through a few
thousand random-bootup tests on x86 32-bit and 64-bit so it's v2.6.24
material i think.
Ingo
6 matches
Mail list logo
