* Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:54:26PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > We could perhaps add a CAP_SYS_ADMIN-only sysctl for this hack,
> > >
> > > That would be more appropriate.
> > >
> > > (I'm
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:54:26PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > We could perhaps add a CAP_SYS_ADMIN-only sysctl for this hack,
> >
> > That would be more appropriate.
> >
> > (I'm still not sure what happened to the idea of adding a call to
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (I'm still not sure what happened to the idea of adding a call to "clear
> out this node+zone's pagecache now" rather than "set this noed+zone's
> policy")
Yes, We need the clear this zones page cache functionality. I am not sure what
the
Martin's recl
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We could perhaps add a CAP_SYS_ADMIN-only sysctl for this hack,
>
> That would be more appropriate.
>
> (I'm still not sure what happened to the idea of adding a call to
> "clear out this node+zone's pagecache now" rather than "set this
> noed+z
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the patch below removes sys_set_zone_reclaim() for now.
Probably the right thing to do.
> ...
> Firstly, the syscall lacks basic syscall design: e.g. it allows the
> global setting of VM policy for unprivileged users. (!)
Martin sent a patch to make
the patch below removes sys_set_zone_reclaim() for now. While i'm sure
Martin is trying to solve a real problem, we must not hard-code an
incomplete and insufficient approach into a syscall, because syscalls
are pretty much for eternity. I am quite strongly convinced that this
syscall must not
6 matches
Mail list logo
