Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI, i have forward ported your MAX_ARG_PAGES limit removal patch to
> 2.6.20-rc2 and have included it in the -rt kernel. It's working great -
> i can now finally do a "ls -t patches/*.patch" in my patch repository -
> something i havent been able to do
Hi!
> FYI, i have forward ported your MAX_ARG_PAGES limit removal patch to
> 2.6.20-rc2 and have included it in the -rt kernel. It's working great -
> i can now finally do a "ls -t patches/*.patch" in my patch repository -
> something i havent been able to do for years ;-)
>
> what is keeping
On 12/29/06, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what is keeping this fix from going upstream?
There are still a couple outstanding issues which need to be resolved
before this is ready for inclusion in the mainline kernel.
The main one is support for CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP, which I think i
[Cc:-ed Ulrich too]
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:
> >
> > Suggest you test (eg) a rebuild of libX11 to see how it reacts to
> > this patch.
>
> Also: please rebuild "xargs" and install first. Otherwise, a lot of
> build script etc that
* Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 09:03:57PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > FYI, i have forward ported your MAX_ARG_PAGES limit removal patch to
> > 2.6.20-rc2 and have included it in the -rt kernel. It's working great -
> > i can now finally do a "ls -t patches
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:
>
> Suggest you test (eg) a rebuild of libX11 to see how it reacts to
> this patch.
Also: please rebuild "xargs" and install first. Otherwise, a lot of
build script etc that use "xargs" won't ever trigger the new limits (or
lack thereof), because xargs
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 09:03:57PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> FYI, i have forward ported your MAX_ARG_PAGES limit removal patch to
> 2.6.20-rc2 and have included it in the -rt kernel. It's working great -
> i can now finally do a "ls -t patches/*.patch" in my patch repository -
> something i ha
g this fix from going upstream?
Ingo
------>
Subject: [patch] remove MAX_ARG_PAGES
From: Ollie Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
this patch removes the MAX_ARG_PAGES limit by copying between VMs. This
makes process argv/env limited by the stack limit (and it's thus
arbitraril
8 matches
Mail list logo