Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, the following patch put moom into workqueue.
hm. Simple, isn't it?
> Do you agree to put sysrq-e and sysrq-i into workqueue too?
If you spy a deadlock then yes, I suppose we should.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 05:21:27PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >>--- 2.6.12-rc1-mm2/mm/oom_kill.c 2005-03-03 17:12:18.0 +0800
> > >>+++ 2.6.12-rc1-mm2-cy/mm/oom_kill.c 2005-03-25 08:07:19.0
> > >>+0800
> > >>@@ -20,6 +20,7
Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>--- 2.6.12-rc1-mm2/mm/oom_kill.c2005-03-03 17:12:18.0 +0800
> >>+++ 2.6.12-rc1-mm2-cy/mm/oom_kill.c 2005-03-25 08:07:19.0 +0800
> >>@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >> #include
> >> #include
> >> #include
> >>+#include
> >>
> >> /* #defin
Andrew Morton wrote:
Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Recent make-sysrq-f-call-oom_kill.patch calls oom-killer in interrupt context,
thus results into panic. This patch fixes out_of_memory() to avoid schedule
when in interrupt context.
Coywolf
Signed-off-by: Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAI
Hello,
akpm, I saw you noticed it,
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0412.0/0424.html
Jim Nelson, this patch is to your post: 2.6.11-rc2-mm2 - kernel panic with
SysRq-f
Recent make-sysrq-f-call-oom_kill.patch calls oom-killer in interrupt context,
thus results into panic. This pat
Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Recent make-sysrq-f-call-oom_kill.patch calls oom-killer in interrupt context,
> thus results into panic. This patch fixes out_of_memory() to avoid schedule
> when in interrupt context.
>
> Coywolf
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL
6 matches
Mail list logo
