Re: [patch] nicksched for 2.6.11

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:02:43 +1100, Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes it is. I have a hack in there that automatically renices any > binary starting with 'XF' to -10 for people who forget. So this > includes XFree86, though maybe it doesn't get the x.org server? X.org's X server binary

Re: [patch] nicksched for 2.6.11

Prakash Punnoor wrote: Nick Piggin schrieb: I've had a few queries about this, so by "popular" demand, I've put my latest nicksched stuff here: www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.11-nicksched.gz It includes all the multiprocessor stuff that's in -mm, and also my alternate scheduler policy. Hi, just t

Re: [patch] nicksched for 2.6.11

Nick Piggin schrieb: > I've had a few queries about this, so by "popular" demand, I've > put my latest nicksched stuff here: > > www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.11-nicksched.gz > > It includes all the multiprocessor stuff that's in -mm, and also > my alternate scheduler policy. Hi, just to make s

[patch] nicksched for 2.6.11

I've had a few queries about this, so by "popular" demand, I've put my latest nicksched stuff here: www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.11-nicksched.gz It includes all the multiprocessor stuff that's in -mm, and also my alternate scheduler policy. Nick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un