Re: [patch] generic bug: use show_regs() instead of dump_stack()

2007-06-29 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 02:19:59PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > - tt = report_bug(regs->iaoq[0] & ~3); > + tt = report_bug(regs->iaoq[0] & ~3, regs); Groovy, I'll try to test this over the weekend. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Re: [patch] generic bug: use show_regs() instead of dump_stack()

2007-06-29 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:19:59 +0200 Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [patch] generic bug: use show_regs() instead of dump_stack() > > From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The current generic bug implementation has a call to dump_stack() in > cas

Re: [patch] generic bug: use show_regs() instead of dump_stack()

2007-06-29 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Heiko Carstens wrote: [patch] generic bug: use show_regs() instead of dump_stack() From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The current generic bug implementation has a call to dump_stack() in case a WARN_ON(whatever) gets hit. Since report_bug(), which calls dump_stack(), gets called f

[patch] generic bug: use show_regs() instead of dump_stack()

2007-06-29 Thread Heiko Carstens
[patch] generic bug: use show_regs() instead of dump_stack() From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The current generic bug implementation has a call to dump_stack() in case a WARN_ON(whatever) gets hit. Since report_bug(), which calls dump_stack(), gets called from an exception handler