Re: [patch] Updated ext2 to use new mark_buffers_dirty interface

2000-09-05 Thread Daniel Phillips
(reposted with non-mangled From address) Alexander Viro wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > > > Rasmus, you introduced a bug because you removed the code but left the > > comment around. now /* this should go into ->truncate */ is there and very > > confusing - what should g

Re: [patch] Updated ext2 to use new mark_buffers_dirty interface

2000-09-04 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Rasmus Andersen wrote: > Hi. > > (I think I have seen you name mentioned as (co-)maintainer of ext2. > Hence this mail.) > > I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran > Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts ext2 as per the following > patch. Lest Steph

Re: [patch] Updated ext2 to use new mark_buffers_dirty interface

2000-09-04 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Rasmus Andersen wrote: > Hi. > > (I think I have seen you name mentioned as (co-)maintainer of ext2. > Hence this mail.) > > I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran > Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts ext2 as per the following > patch. Umm... S

[patch] Updated ext2 to use new mark_buffers_dirty interface

2000-09-04 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. (I think I have seen you name mentioned as (co-)maintainer of ext2. Hence this mail.) I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts ext2 as per the following patch. diff -u --recursive -X misc/dontdiff linux-240test8-pre2/fs/ext2/ballo