Re: [patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-11 Thread Alan Cox
> > AFAIK and IIRC pi2.c and pt2.c are obsoleted by dmascc.c anyway. > > I believe we can remove those two -- any objections? > > Well, I won't remove them from the v2.0-tree, and I don't know about v2.2, > but from v2.4 that seems like a sane decision. If dmascc can be confirmed to handle these

Re: [patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-11 Thread David Weinehall
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Joerg Reuter wrote: > On suse.lists.linux.kernel, David wrote: > > > Apparently, _noone_ uses these simultaneous, as this > > bug has existed since the times of v2.0.xx at least... > > ;-) > > AFAIK and IIRC pi2.c and pt2.c are obsoleted by dmascc.c anyway. > I believe we

Re: [patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-11 Thread Joerg Reuter
On suse.lists.linux.kernel, David wrote: > Apparently, _noone_ uses these simultaneous, as this > bug has existed since the times of v2.0.xx at least... ;-) AFAIK and IIRC pi2.c and pt2.c are obsoleted by dmascc.c anyway. I believe we can remove those two -- any objections? Regards, Joerg Reu

Re: [patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-09 Thread Alan Cox
> > This patches changes the names of the init-functions for the > > hamradio-drivers pt.c and pi2.c. None of the new names are used anywhere > > else in the kernel. > > Patch applied, but I also wonder why these things are global names anyway? > Why not just change them to be static? Because 2.

Re: [patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-09 Thread David Weinehall
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > This patch fixes a init-function name-clash between some code in paride > > and net/hamradio. Apparently, _noone_ uses these simultaneous, as this > > bug has existed since the times of v2.0.xx at least...

Re: [patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-09 Thread Arjan van de Ven
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This patch fixes a init-function name-clash between some code in paride > and net/hamradio. Apparently, _noone_ uses these simultaneous, as this > bug has existed since the times of v2.0.xx at least... > This patches changes the names of the init-functi

Re: [patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-08 Thread David Weinehall
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, David Weinehall wrote: > > > > This patches changes the names of the init-functions for the > > hamradio-drivers pt.c and pi2.c. None of the new names are used anywhere > > else in the kernel. > > Patch applied, but I also wo

Re: [patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, David Weinehall wrote: > > This patches changes the names of the init-functions for the > hamradio-drivers pt.c and pi2.c. None of the new names are used anywhere > else in the kernel. Patch applied, but I also wonder why these things are global names anyway? Why not just c

[patch] Name-clash between paride & hamradio

2000-09-08 Thread David Weinehall
This patch fixes a init-function name-clash between some code in paride and net/hamradio. Apparently, _noone_ uses these simultaneous, as this bug has existed since the times of v2.0.xx at least... This patches changes the names of the init-functions for the hamradio-drivers pt.c and pi2.c. None