Hi Andreas,
On Friday 28 September 2007, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> The name path_put_conditional (formerly, dput_path) is a little unclear.
> Replace (path_put_conditional + path_put) with path_walk_put_both,
> "put a pair of paths after a path_walk" (see the kerneldoc).
^
On Fri, Sep 28, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> The name path_put_conditional (formerly, dput_path) is a little unclear.
> Replace (path_put_conditional + path_put) with path_walk_put_both,
> "put a pair of paths after a path_walk" (see the kerneldoc).
Hmm, I don't know. To put both the nd and path
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:43:50PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Here is another cleanup on top of Jan's set. Comments?
>
>
> The name path_put_conditional (formerly, dput_path) is a little unclear.
> Replace (path_put_conditional + path_put) with path_walk_put_both,
> "put a pair of paths
Here is another cleanup on top of Jan's set. Comments?
The name path_put_conditional (formerly, dput_path) is a little unclear.
Replace (path_put_conditional + path_put) with path_walk_put_both,
"put a pair of paths after a path_walk" (see the kerneldoc).
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <[EMA
4 matches
Mail list logo