On Fri 10-06-16 16:24:59, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> that was fast!
>
> On (06/10/16 08:34), Michal Hocko wrote:
> [..]
> > OK, so this is flags & GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK BUG_ON because gfp is
> > ___GFP_HIGHMEM. It is my [1] patch which has introduced it.
> > I think we need the following. Andrew coul
that was fast!
On (06/10/16 08:34), Michal Hocko wrote:
[..]
> OK, so this is flags & GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK BUG_ON because gfp is
> ___GFP_HIGHMEM. It is my [1] patch which has introduced it.
> I think we need the following. Andrew could you fold it into
> mm-memcg-use-consistent-gfp-flags-during-read
On Fri 10-06-16 15:11:39, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [ 429.191962] gfp: 2
> [ 429.192634] [ cut here ]
> [ 429.193281] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:1616!
[...]
> [ 429.217369] [] bio_alloc_bioset+0xbd/0x1b1
> [ 429.218013] [] mpage_alloc+0x28/0x7b
> [ 429.218
Hello,
[ 429.191962] gfp: 2
[ 429.192634] [ cut here ]
[ 429.193281] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:1616!
[ 429.193920] invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 429.194556] Modules linked in: nls_iso8859_1 nls_cp437 vfat fat
snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda
4 matches
Mail list logo