Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault

2017-09-28 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:01:21PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:44:22AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > Agreed, changing it to "unsigned long" and "rsp" will probably fix it. > > > > I had made it "unsigned int" because of a clang issue with "unsigned > > long": > >

Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault

2017-09-28 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:44:22AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > Agreed, changing it to "unsigned long" and "rsp" will probably fix it. > > I had made it "unsigned int" because of a clang issue with "unsigned > long": > > CC arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.o > In file includ

Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault

2017-09-28 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:21:07AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:47 AM, kernel test robot > wrote: > > > > [ 10.587519] RIP: 0010:compat_sock_ioctl+0xfea/0x103e > > [ 10.587974] RSP: :00277d78 EFLAGS: 00010283 > > [ 10.588448] RAX: 00277d78 RBX

Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault

2017-09-28 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:47 AM, kernel test robot wrote: > > [ 10.587519] RIP: 0010:compat_sock_ioctl+0xfea/0x103e > [ 10.587974] RSP: :00277d78 EFLAGS: 00010283 > [ 10.588448] RAX: 00277d78 RBX: 8933 RCX: > 8800141a8000 > [ 10.589103] RDX: 00

Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault

2017-09-28 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:49:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Sure, but its still an officially supported GCC version. So either it > > must be made to work, or we must update the minimal GCC version > > requirements for the kernel. > > Of course! I just mean I'd not be surprised if this was a

Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault

2017-09-28 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:59:07AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit: > > > > > > commit: f5caf621ee357279e759c0911daf6d55c7d36f03 ("x86/asm: Fix inline > > > asm call constraints for

Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault

2017-09-28 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:59:07AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit: > > > > commit: f5caf621ee357279e759c0911daf6d55c7d36f03 ("x86/asm: Fix inline asm > > call constraints for Clang") > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux

Re: [lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault

2017-09-28 Thread Ingo Molnar
* kernel test robot wrote: > > FYI, we noticed the following commit: > > commit: f5caf621ee357279e759c0911daf6d55c7d36f03 ("x86/asm: Fix inline asm > call constraints for Clang") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > in testcase: trinity > with followin

[lkp-robot] [x86/asm] f5caf621ee: PANIC:double_fault

2017-09-28 Thread kernel test robot
FYI, we noticed the following commit: commit: f5caf621ee357279e759c0911daf6d55c7d36f03 ("x86/asm: Fix inline asm call constraints for Clang") https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master in testcase: trinity with following parameters: runtime: 300s test-descr