> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:02:09 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:02:44 -0700
> > From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 11:25:10AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I think that "continuing" codepath came from someone at Phoenix, FWIW;
> >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 11:25:10AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> > I think that "continuing" codepath came from someone at
> >> > Phoenix, FWIW;
>
> That was me.
Thanks. It's good to have BIOS experts involved too. :)
> >> > the problem is that I see the PCI quirks code has evolve
MAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: 2.6.13-rc4-mm1
>
>> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:02:44 -0700
>> From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 11:25:10AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > I think that "continui
> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:02:44 -0700
> From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 11:25:10AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I think that "continuing" codepath came from someone at Phoenix, FWIW;
> > the problem is that I see the PCI quirks code has evolved even farther
>
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 11:25:10AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think that "continuing" codepath came from someone at Phoenix, FWIW;
> the problem is that I see the PCI quirks code has evolved even farther
> from the main copy of the init code in the USB tree. Sigh.
I don't like that eithe
> > If my Prolific USB-Serialadapter plugged in on reboot
> > the ehci_hcd driver complains about a Hand-off bug in Bios.
> >
> > -> snip
> >
> > ehci_hcd :00:1d.7: EHCI Host Controller
> > ehci_hcd :00:1d.7: debug port 1
> >
> > ehci_hcd :00:1d.7: BIOS handoff failed (104, 01010001
6 matches
Mail list logo
