On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 07:53:35AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>
> I'd be happy with that, except on the 2.4 trees where we haven't
> seen such a patch yet. (So Greg -- please hold off on this
> for 2.5 unless/until it becomes clear Ivan's patch won't happen.)
I'll hold off for both 2.5 and 2.4
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 07:53:35AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Please don't -- Ivan has a patch for this, let's get that in instead.
>
> I'd be happy with that, except on the 2.4 trees where we haven't
> seen such a patch yet. (So Greg -- please hold off on this
> for 2.
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 07:21:42AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
Hi,
Some users have been sending init logs for Athlon kernels that
include PCI warning messages about the PCI cache line size
getting set incorrectly ... where the kernel thinks that the
right value is 16 bytes. S
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 07:21:42AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some users have been sending init logs for Athlon kernels that
> include PCI warning messages about the PCI cache line size
> getting set incorrectly ... where the kernel thinks that the
> right value is 16 bytes. Since 64
4 matches
Mail list logo
