On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 14:04:46 -0700, Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:53:19PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote:
>>
>> > I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing
>> > the
>> > delay seems to fix
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:53:19PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote:
>
> > I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing
> > the
> > delay seems to fix it, albeit temporarily. The further you go in using the
> > disk in such an enclos
On Sunday 04 September 2005 03:53, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> This one certainly goes into the Bizarro file.
>
> Just out of curiosity -- when you use the powered hub, does the drive work
> even if you remove that delay completely?
I haven't tested that. I will, next time I need the drive, which will p
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> Hello lists,
>
> (a mail for the archives)
>
> I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing the
> delay seems to fix it, albeit temporarily. The further you go in using the
> disk in such an enclosure, the higher the udelay
4 matches
Mail list logo
