--- Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at the code, class
> device is already doing it that way, so here's the full-assed fix.
> Chris, can you please test the attached patch?
Tejun,
So far so good; my 2.6.20.11+patch kernel hasn't oopsed yet. I'm going to start
using this kernel
as
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 05:01:25PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:30:41PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Chris Rankin wrote:
> >>> --- Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, we can fix the problem Chris is seeing by breaking module unload (by
> a
Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:30:41PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Chris Rankin wrote:
>>> --- Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, we can fix the problem Chris is seeing by breaking module unload (by
allowing it to unload too early). It doesn't sound too hot but module
>
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:30:41PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Chris Rankin wrote:
> > --- Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> So, we can fix the problem Chris is seeing by breaking module unload (by
> >> allowing it to unload too early). It doesn't sound too hot but module
> >> unloading race
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> As written above, I think it's better to risk module unload / sysfs race
>> than keeping the current sysfs deletion / open race. What do you guys
>> think?
>>
>
> How about embedding struct attribute fro devt into struct
> [class_]device for now? It is not too big and de
Hi Tejun,
On 5/9/07, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Rankin wrote:
> --- Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Okay, here's a half-assed fix. With this patch applied, if you try to
>> unload a module while you're opening it's dev attribute, kernel will
>> oops later when the file i
Chris Rankin wrote:
> --- Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Okay, here's a half-assed fix. With this patch applied, if you try to
>> unload a module while you're opening it's dev attribute, kernel will
>> oops later when the file is accessed or closed later but it should fix
>> the bug winec
--- Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, here's a half-assed fix. With this patch applied, if you try to
> unload a module while you're opening it's dev attribute, kernel will
> oops later when the file is accessed or closed later but it should fix
> the bug winecfg triggers. I really dun
Chris Rankin wrote:
> --- Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, we can fix the problem Chris is seeing by breaking module unload (by
>> allowing it to unload too early). It doesn't sound too hot but module
>> unloading race is much less likely than sysfs node deletion/open race.
>
> Yikes!
--- Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, we can fix the problem Chris is seeing by breaking module unload (by
> allowing it to unload too early). It doesn't sound too hot but module
> unloading race is much less likely than sysfs node deletion/open race.
Yikes! Just temporary breakage, I ho
[adding back linux-usb-devel. please don't drop cc]
[also adding lkml and Greg K-H]
Chris Rankin wrote:
> --- Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Okay, here's patch against 2.6.20.11. Let's hope we're not chasing
>> something which is already fixed.
>
> Hooray! The trick was to trace the "d
11 matches
Mail list logo
