Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] bug removing ehci-hcd

2007-06-07 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:26:10AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I wasn't actually able to reproduce the bug myself, but I guess it is > pretty obvious that I shouldn't have called cpufreq_unregister_notifier > with a spinlock held. I haven't been doing this long enough to know > exactly wh

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] bug removing ehci-hcd

2007-06-06 Thread Satyam Sharma
On 6/7/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I remember this one ... On 6/7/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:26:10AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I wasn't actually able to reproduce the bug myself, but I guess it is > > pretty obvious tha

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] bug removing ehci-hcd

2007-06-06 Thread Satyam Sharma
Hi, I remember this one ... On 6/7/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:26:10AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I wasn't actually able to reproduce the bug myself, but I guess it is > pretty obvious that I shouldn't have called cpufreq_unregister_notifier > with

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] bug removing ehci-hcd

2007-06-06 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:26:10AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I wasn't actually able to reproduce the bug myself, but I guess it is > pretty obvious that I shouldn't have called cpufreq_unregister_notifier > with a spinlock held. I haven't been doing this long enough to know > exactly wh

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] bug removing ehci-hcd

2007-05-31 Thread Stuart_Hayes
I wasn't actually able to reproduce the bug myself, but I guess it is pretty obvious that I shouldn't have called cpufreq_unregister_notifier with a spinlock held. I haven't been doing this long enough to know exactly which kernel this patch should be against, so let me know if this ins't good.