Hi,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:44:01PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 09-03-16 16:28, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:17:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> >>Hi,
>> >>
>> >>On 09-03-16 1
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:44:01PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09-03-16 16:28, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:17:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On 09-03-16 11:50, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>The axp209 PMIC used in co
Hi,
On 16-03-16 11:10, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:17:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Eventually, yes, it needs both. But they don't even have to be the
same driver, since they provide two different features. The only
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:17:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Eventually, yes, it needs both. But they don't even have to be the
>> same driver, since they provide two different features. The only
>> reason we have that construct in the
Hi,
On 09-03-16 16:28, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:17:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09-03-16 11:50, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
The axp209 PMIC used in combination to some Allwinner SoCs has a bunch
of GPIOs accessible. Some boards use these to control their b
5 matches
Mail list logo