Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add AXP209 GPIO driver

2016-03-22 Thread Chen-Yu Tsai
Hi, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:44:01PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 09-03-16 16:28, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:17:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> >>Hi, >> >> >> >>On 09-03-16 1

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add AXP209 GPIO driver

2016-03-22 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:44:01PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 09-03-16 16:28, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:17:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>On 09-03-16 11:50, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>The axp209 PMIC used in co

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add AXP209 GPIO driver

2016-03-16 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 16-03-16 11:10, Linus Walleij wrote: On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:17:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Eventually, yes, it needs both. But they don't even have to be the same driver, since they provide two different features. The only

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add AXP209 GPIO driver

2016-03-16 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:17:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Eventually, yes, it needs both. But they don't even have to be the >> same driver, since they provide two different features. The only >> reason we have that construct in the

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add AXP209 GPIO driver

2016-03-09 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09-03-16 16:28, Maxime Ripard wrote: Hi, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:17:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 09-03-16 11:50, Maxime Ripard wrote: Hi, The axp209 PMIC used in combination to some Allwinner SoCs has a bunch of GPIOs accessible. Some boards use these to control their b