: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
> Uwe Bugla wrote:
>
> > 1. You utmost personally are responsible for 4 ununsable kernels, as far
> as bt8xx cards are concerned: 2.6.13, 2.6.14, 2.6.15, 2.6.16!
> > 2. You did not e
Manu, also for you please stop it, we know that Uwe writes abusive
stuff but you don't have to go on with it.
It's about the patch Trent wrote if you're not able to discuss it wait
for others to comment it.
I only saw subjective reasons why you are against it, but the actual
patch doesn't cross y
Uwe Bugla wrote:
> 1. You utmost personally are responsible for 4 ununsable kernels, as far as
> bt8xx cards are concerned: 2.6.13, 2.6.14, 2.6.15, 2.6.16!
> 2. You did not even want to imply to resolve that issue by incarnating that
> "community and synergy principle" that linux community needs
ist ,
Linux DVB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
> Trent Piepho wrote:
>
> > The issue with dst is just a minor missing feature to fully support the
> dvb
> > helper module customi
Krufky
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
> pseudo-authorities
>
> > On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Anyway, I'll get out of t
On 5/1/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote:
> The issue with dst is just a minor missing feature to fully support the
dvb
> helper module customization system. So nobody needs to worry about this
> anymore, the last two patches in this repository will fix it correctly
>
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Anyway, I'll get out of the discussion. There's clearly some personality
> > issues in the DVB area, and I don't know q
Trent Piepho wrote:
> The issue with dst is just a minor missing feature to fully support the dvb
> helper module customization system. So nobody needs to worry about this
> anymore, the last two patches in this repository will fix it correctly.
With regards to the dst, i have explained earlier
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Anyway, I'll get out of the discussion. There's clearly some personality
> issues in the DVB area, and I don't know quite _why_ that is, but Uwe,
> you're definitely not helping.
There isn't a problem here, just a lot of noise coming from one source. I
On 4/30/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 30 2007 19:25, Uwe Bugla wrote:
>THIS PATCH IS DONE TO AVOID RAM WASTE FOR CASES IN WHICH IT IS PROVEN THAT
DST
>AND DST_CA ARE NOT NEEDED AT ALL
>[...]
How much on the Theo-meter are we yet?
it's enough, I told him that I'll
On Apr 30 2007 19:25, Uwe Bugla wrote:
>THIS PATCH IS DONE TO AVOID RAM WASTE FOR CASES IN WHICH IT IS PROVEN THAT DST
>AND DST_CA ARE NOT NEEDED AT ALL
>[...]
How much on the Theo-meter are we yet?
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the b
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:25:47 +0200
> "Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I did not manage to at least find one single unresolved module during
> c
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:25:47 +0200
"Uwe Bugla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did not manage to at least find one single unresolved module during
> compilation, and I have been working with this almost fantastic solution with
> several kernels for months now!
That isn't what Mauro is saying. W
PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
>
>
> Uwe, you just made my kill-list.
>
> I've not actually done that in _years_. So you can feel proud. Your emails
> will get automatically filtered to their own (ig
Uwe, you just made my kill-list.
I've not actually done that in _years_. So you can feel proud. Your emails
will get automatically filtered to their own (ignored) folder. I told you
why, and you didn't seem to understand at all.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
> Hi Helge and others,
>
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
>
> >> what the consequence is. To be truthful I would strategically prefare a
> >> vacuum at the price that the wor
Hi Helge and others,
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
what the consequence is. To be truthful I would strategically prefare a
vacuum at the price that the work isn't even done for months.
ONLY IF there is a personnel vacuum the necessity for others to volunteer
will arise.
A suffic
TED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Trent Piepho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
> Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > And I swear that this dvb-pll.c is completely obsolete for this
> scenario!
> > For that reason (old varia
about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
> Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:21:29 +0200
> > Von: Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > CC: linux-kernel@
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Uwe Bugla wrote:
>
> "If you want to change something, it's not fine to be entirely polite all the
> time:"
"entirely polite all the time" is totally different from "cannot _ever_
be polite".
Also, quite frankly, in order to be impolite, you have to build up a
certain a
Uwe Bugla wrote:
> And I swear that this dvb-pll.c is completely obsolete for this scenario!
> For that reason (old variant):
> # CONFIG_DVB_TUNER_LGH06XF is not set
>
> And this old variant was NOT done by Trent Piepho, it was NOT done by Andrew
> Quincey,
> but it was produced by Michael Krufky
@vger.kernel.org
> Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21
and pseudo-authorities
>
>
>> Uwe Bugla wrote:
>>
>>> In this ten Emails you will yourself see the intellectual and technical
>>>
>> proof in how far Mr. Chehab is
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> >
> > So please Linus - rip that crap out of 2.6.21-git2. And if you do see
> questions what parts you n
Uwe Bugla wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:21:29 +0200
Von: Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Uwe Bugla wrote:
>
> So please Linus - rip that crap out of 2.6.21-git2. And if you do see
> questions what parts you need to rip out, please feel free to ask me
>
Uwe. I'll say this ONCE more.
No.
And unless you can become politer and more respectful and stop ranti
], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
> On 4/30/07, Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:48:34 +0200
> > Von: &q
TED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
> On 4/30/07, Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Ori
MAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
> On 4/30/07, Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 0
ECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21
and pseudo-authorities
> Am Montag, den 30.04.2007, 01:00 +0200 schrieb Uwe Bugla:
> > Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:19
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:21:29 +0200
Von: Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
>
Uwe,
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 13:02 +0200, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > stupid and utmost hypocritic excuse for bare naked incompatibility,
> > dumbness,
> > wrong solidarity, kiddishness and technical incompetence.
...
> > soap in Andrew Morton's face with this enourmous threat of incompetence,
> > kiddish
Uwe Bugla wrote:
In this ten Emails you will yourself see the intellectual and technical proof
in how far Mr. Chehab is acting with nothing else but:
a. Lies
b. Unproven thesis
c. Stigmatizations
and so on.
THIS MAN HAS NO IDEA, BUT HE HAS THE POWER!
Please note that there are ways to repl
etreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and
pseudo-authorities
> Am Montag, den 30.04.2007, 01:00 +0200 schrieb Uwe Bugla:
> > Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
> > Von: Linus Torvalds <[E
Am Montag, den 30.04.2007, 01:00 +0200 schrieb Uwe Bugla:
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
> Von: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> linux-kerne
34 matches
Mail list logo
