* Avi Kivity wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > * Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Amit Shah wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> What are you using to issue the hypercall?
> >>
> >
> > + r = kvm_hypercall1(KVM_PV_PCI_DEVICE, page_gfn);
> >
> > Setup is done by:
> >
> > + if (!kvm_para_availab
Amit Shah wrote:
* Anthony Liguori wrote:
Amit Shah wrote:
* Anthony Liguori wrote:
This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better
support live migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by
trapping the UD exception that would occur if you used
* Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > * Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >
> >> This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better
> >> support live migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by
> >> trapping the UD exception that would occur if you used the wrong
Amit Shah wrote:
* Anthony Liguori wrote:
This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better support
live migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by trapping the
UD exception that would occur if you used the wrong hypercall instruction
for the underlying architec
Amit Shah wrote:
* Anthony Liguori wrote:
This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better support
live migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by trapping the
UD exception that would occur if you used the wrong hypercall instruction
for the underlying architec
* Anthony Liguori wrote:
> This patch refactors the current hypercall infrastructure to better support
> live migration and SMP. It eliminates the hypercall page by trapping the
> UD exception that would occur if you used the wrong hypercall instruction
> for the underlying architecture and replac
6 matches
Mail list logo