> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> > What happens if some structures cannot be made const because there is a
> >> > reassignment somewhere? Is there any feedback about the problem?
the constify plugin basically simulates what a source level 'const' would
do (sets a specif
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Emese Revfy wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:50:47 + (GMT)
>> >> Julia Lawall wrote:
>> >> > > Actually, it look
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Emese Revfy wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:50:47 + (GMT)
> >> Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> > > Actually, it looks like Emese Revfy is going to merge the GCC plugin
> >> > > c
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Emese Revfy wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:50:47 + (GMT)
>> Julia Lawall wrote:
>> > > Actually, it looks like Emese Revfy is going to merge the GCC plugin
>> > > constify stuff sooner rather than later so maybe addi
On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 18:12 +, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> > Yeah, that's tricky and I don't have an answer but marking things as
> > const is a worth while in itself because it makes static some analysis
> > easier.
>
> I'm not clear on how to procee
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Yeah, that's tricky and I don't have an answer but marking things as
> const is a worth while in itself because it makes static some analysis
> easier.
I'm not clear on how to proceed here...
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Emese Revfy wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:50:47 + (GMT)
> Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > Actually, it looks like Emese Revfy is going to merge the GCC plugin
> > > constify stuff sooner rather than later so maybe adding all these consts
> > > isn't going to be needed.
> >
> >
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 14:50:47 + (GMT)
Julia Lawall wrote:
> > Actually, it looks like Emese Revfy is going to merge the GCC plugin
> > constify stuff sooner rather than later so maybe adding all these consts
> > isn't going to be needed.
>
> Is there any advantage of const over the plugin? The
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 02:50:47PM +, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> > Actually, it looks like Emese Revfy is going to merge the GCC plugin
> > constify stuff sooner rather than later so maybe adding all these consts
> > isn't going to be needed.
>
>
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Actually, it looks like Emese Revfy is going to merge the GCC plugin
> constify stuff sooner rather than later so maybe adding all these consts
> isn't going to be needed.
Is there any advantage of const over the plugin? The consts are easy to
add.
D
Actually, it looks like Emese Revfy is going to merge the GCC plugin
constify stuff sooner rather than later so maybe adding all these consts
isn't going to be needed.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to maj
Yeah, that's tricky and I don't have an answer but marking things as
const is a worth while in itself because it makes static some analysis
easier.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.o
12 matches
Mail list logo
