Hi Kees,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> Kees had previously pushed a patch to do so but it exposed a couple of
>> underlying issues, mostly with low power paths
>> (c.f. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.k
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 1/22/16 9:19 AM, David Brown wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:08:34AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>>> This introduces __ro_after_init as a way to mark such memory, and uses
>>> it on the x86 vDSO to kill an extant kernel exploitation
On 1/22/16 9:19 AM, David Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:08:34AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
This introduces __ro_after_init as a way to mark such memory, and uses
it on the x86 vDSO to kill an extant kernel exploitation method. Also
adds a new kernel parameter to help debug future use and
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:08:34AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
This introduces __ro_after_init as a way to mark such memory, and uses
it on the x86 vDSO to kill an extant kernel exploitation method. Also
adds a new kernel parameter to help debug future use and adds an lkdtm
test to check the results
4 matches
Mail list logo
