On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Sorry for missing your report here. Before we disable this again for
> gen4 I want to make sure that it's the same irq misrouting issue which
> was already the cause for the gmbus irq mess. Can you please boot with
> pci=nomsi (so that i915 uses irq16)?
>
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>> >> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
>> >> [ ... snip ... ]
>> >> > Daniel Vetter (59):
>> >> [ ... snip ... ]
>> >> > drm/i915: dp aux irq support for g4x/vlv
>> >>
>> >>
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
> >> [ ... snip ... ]
> >> > Daniel Vetter (59):
> >> [ ... snip ... ]
> >> > drm/i915: dp aux irq support for g4x/vlv
> >>
> >> This commit causes all kinds of havoc on my ThinkPad x200s. I
On Fri, 07 Feb 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
>> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
>> [ ... snip ... ]
>> > Daniel Vetter (59):
>> [ ... snip ... ]
>> > drm/i915: dp aux irq support for g4x/vlv
>>
>> This commit causes all kinds o
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
> [ ... snip ... ]
> > Daniel Vetter (59):
> [ ... snip ... ]
> > drm/i915: dp aux irq support for g4x/vlv
>
> This commit causes all kinds of havoc on my ThinkPad x200s. It results in
[ ... s
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Dave Airlie wrote:
> git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
[ ... snip ... ]
> Daniel Vetter (59):
[ ... snip ... ]
> drm/i915: dp aux irq support for g4x/vlv
This commit causes all kinds of havoc on my ThinkPad x200s. It results in
irq 16: nobody care
Dave Airlie schreef op do 30-01-2014 om 02:49 [+]:
> Christian König (10):
> [...]
> drm/radeon: add GART debugfs access v3
> [...]
That one generates a bit of (warning) noise when building on 32 bits
x86:
In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:13:0,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> For some reason the request-pull and the merge into your tree look different,
> since some of the changes in this have already gone in via the arm-soc tree
> and dma stuff, all for tegra. Hopefully nobody rebased when they shouldn't.
Looks m
8 matches
Mail list logo