Re: [for-next][PATCH 0/5] tracing: Add string_has_prefix() and usages

2018-12-22 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 12:41:20 +0900 Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Steven Rostedt (VMware) (5): > > string.h: Add str_has_prefix() helper function > > tracing: Use str_has_prefix() helper for histogram code > > tracing: Use str_has_prefix() instead of using fixed sizes > > tracing

Re: [for-next][PATCH 0/5] tracing: Add string_has_prefix() and usages

2018-12-22 Thread Namhyung Kim
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:20:07AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I hope everyone is OK with these changes. I pushed to linux-next but I'm > willing to change them if there are still issues. > > They ran through all my tests, althought zero-day-bot had a weird build > regression in sh, that looks

Re: [for-next][PATCH 0/5] tracing: Add string_has_prefix() and usages

2018-12-22 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 11:20:07 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > They ran through all my tests, althought zero-day-bot had a weird build > regression in sh, that looks totally unrelated: > > Regressions in current branch: > > arch/sh/kernel/dwarf.c:107:26: error: 'dwarf_frame_reg' defined but not u

[for-next][PATCH 0/5] tracing: Add string_has_prefix() and usages

2018-12-22 Thread Steven Rostedt
I hope everyone is OK with these changes. I pushed to linux-next but I'm willing to change them if there are still issues. They ran through all my tests, althought zero-day-bot had a weird build regression in sh, that looks totally unrelated: Regressions in current branch: arch/sh/kernel/dwarf