On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 05:41:57PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
[snip]
> > > > You're right. We don't need to drop it having the lowest ino first.
> > > > Actually, I was supposed to add an LRU list for extent_trees.
> > > > But, do we need to really take care of its order for already evicted
> > > > i
rg;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: shrink unreferenced extent_caches
> first
>
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 05:41:57PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > > > You'
To: Chao Yu
> > > Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: shrink unreferenced
> > > extent_caches first
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 02
.kernel.org;
> > linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: shrink unreferenced extent_caches
> > first
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 08:39:43PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From:
t; To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim; Jaegeuk Kim
> > > Subject: [f2
fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim; Jaegeuk Kim
> > Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: shrink unreferenced extent_caches
> > first
> >
> > If an
.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim; Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: shrink unreferenced extent_caches first
>
> If an extent_tree entry has a zero reference count, we can drop it from the
> cache in higher priority rather t
7 matches
Mail list logo
