Kirill Korotaev wrote:
On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alas, I fear this might have quite bad worst-case behaviour. One small
container which is under constant memory pressure will churn the
system-wide LRUs like mad, and will consume rather a lot of system time.
So it's a
On 2/19/07, Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think it's OK for a container to consume lots of system time during
> reclaim, as long as we can account that time to the container involved
> (i.e. if it's done during direct reclaim rather than by something like
> kswapd).
hmm, is it
> On 2/19/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Alas, I fear this might have quite bad worst-case behaviour. One small
>>container which is under constant memory pressure will churn the
>>system-wide LRUs like mad, and will consume rather a lot of system time.
>>So it's a point at whic
3 matches
Mail list logo
