On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 02:54:19PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Andrea writes:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:05:53PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > the RAID and LVM make_request functions should be changed to do that
> > > instead (i.e. 0 on success, -ve on error, and maybe "1" if they do t
Andrea writes:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:05:53PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > the RAID and LVM make_request functions should be changed to do that
> > instead (i.e. 0 on success, -ve on error, and maybe "1" if they do their
> > own recursion to break the loop)?
>
> We preferred to let the
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:05:53PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> the RAID and LVM make_request functions should be changed to do that
> instead (i.e. 0 on success, -ve on error, and maybe "1" if they do their
> own recursion to break the loop)?
We preferred to let the lowlevel drivers to handle
Neil Brown write:
> On Thursday November 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > in generic_make_request(), the following code handles stacking:
> >
> > do {
> >q = blk_get_queue(bh->b_rdev);
> >if (!q) {
> > printk(...)
> > buffer_IO_error
On Thursday November 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [cc'ed to maintainers of md and lvm]
>
> hi,
> in generic_make_request(), the following code handles stacking:
>
> do {
>q = blk_get_queue(bh->b_rdev);
>if (!q) {
> printk(...)
> b
[cc'ed to maintainers of md and lvm]
hi,
in generic_make_request(), the following code handles stacking:
do {
q = blk_get_queue(bh->b_rdev);
if (!q) {
printk(...)
buffer_IO_error(bh);
break;
}
} while (q
6 matches
Mail list logo
