Hi Stephen, again
Can I confirm ??
Was I misunderstanding ??
> I understand your point, but I think devm_get_clk_from_child()
> needs new DT setings, and it can't keep compatibility, or
> it makes driver complex.
> I think it is nice to have. but, I want to keep current style.
> Thus, I will try
Hi Stephen
Thank you for your feedback.
> > > > sound_soc {
> > > > clocks = <&xxx>, <&xxx>;
> > > > clock-names = "cpu", "codec";
> > > > ...
> > > > cpu {
> > > > ...
> > > > };
> >
On 11/24, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen, again
>
> > > I've seen bindings that have the 'clocks' property at the top
> > > level and the appropriate 'clock-names' property to relate the
> > > clocks to a subnode.
> > >
> > > sound_soc {
> > > clocks = <&xxx>, <&xxx>;
> > >
Hi Stephen, again
> > I've seen bindings that have the 'clocks' property at the top
> > level and the appropriate 'clock-names' property to relate the
> > clocks to a subnode.
> >
> > sound_soc {
> > clocks = <&xxx>, <&xxx>;
> > clock-names = "cpu", "codec";
> >
Hi Stephen
Thank you for your feedback
> I've seen bindings that have the 'clocks' property at the top
> level and the appropriate 'clock-names' property to relate the
> clocks to a subnode.
>
> sound_soc {
> clocks = <&xxx>, <&xxx>;
> clock-names = "cpu", "cod
On 11/16, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Rob, Michael, Russell
>
>
> What is the conclusion of this patch ?
> We shouldn't add devm_of_clk_get() ? or can I continue ?
>
> The problem of current [devm_]clk_get() handles *dev only,
> but I need to get clocks from DT node, not dev
>
> soun
Hi Rob, Michael, Russell
What is the conclusion of this patch ?
We shouldn't add devm_of_clk_get() ? or can I continue ?
The problem of current [devm_]clk_get() handles *dev only,
but I need to get clocks from DT node, not dev
sound_soc {
...
cpu {
Hi Rob, Michael, Russell
Cc Rob
What is the conclusion of this patch ?
We shouldn't add devm_of_clk_get() ? or I can continue ?
> Thank you for your feedback
>
> > > struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
> > > {
> > > ...
> > > if (dev) {
> > >
Hi Rob, Michael, Russell
Cc Rob
What is the conclusion of this patch ?
We shouldn't add devm_of_clk_get() ? or I can continue ?
> Thank you for your feedback
>
> > > struct clk *clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
> > > {
> > > ...
> > > if (dev) {
> > >
9 matches
Mail list logo
