On 2015-03-04 09:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
The main question whether it is worth to consider this alternative is
the performance aspect. Does anyone have an idea which USB devices would
typically be used via pvusb? I'd suspect memory sticks and USB disks
and perhaps webcams being the most performa
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:46:33PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 15:41 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > On 03/04/2015 03:29 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 14:19 +, David Vrabel wrote:
> > >> On 04/03/15 14:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> The mai
On 03/04/2015 04:27 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:31:08PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 03/02/2015 12:39 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 26/02/15 13:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
Introduces the Xen pvUSB backend. With pvUSB it is possible for a Xen
domU to communicate with a USB device
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:31:08PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 03/02/2015 12:39 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
> >On 26/02/15 13:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>Introduces the Xen pvUSB backend. With pvUSB it is possible for a Xen
> >>domU to communicate with a USB device assigned to that domU. The
> >>
Juergen Gross wrote:
> Do you have another feeling about the probability of a need to do usb 3?
> If it is already on the horizon I wouldn't want to do the user space
> backend now and the kernel one next year. :-)
One year is pretty long in kernel time.
//Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 15:41 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 03:29 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 14:19 +, David Vrabel wrote:
> >> On 04/03/15 14:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The main question whether it is worth to consider this alternative is
> >>> the p
On 03/04/2015 03:29 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 14:19 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 04/03/15 14:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
The main question whether it is worth to consider this alternative is
the performance aspect. Does anyone have an idea which USB devices would
typically be
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 14:19 +, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 04/03/15 14:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >
> > The main question whether it is worth to consider this alternative is
> > the performance aspect. Does anyone have an idea which USB devices would
> > typically be used via pvusb? I'd suspect m
On 04/03/15 14:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
>
> The main question whether it is worth to consider this alternative is
> the performance aspect. Does anyone have an idea which USB devices would
> typically be used via pvusb? I'd suspect memory sticks and USB disks
> and perhaps webcams being the most p
On 03/04/2015 02:53 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 04/03/15 13:31, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 03/02/2015 12:39 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 26/02/15 13:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
Introduces the Xen pvUSB backend. With pvUSB it is possible for a Xen
domU to communicate with a USB device assigned to that d
On 04/03/15 13:31, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 03/02/2015 12:39 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 26/02/15 13:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> Introduces the Xen pvUSB backend. With pvUSB it is possible for a Xen
>>> domU to communicate with a USB device assigned to that domU. The
>>> communication is all do
On 03/04/2015 02:41 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 14:31 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
- move module to appropriate location in kernel tree
drivers/xen/ is the correct location for this driver.
Hmm, so you regard placement of xen-netback under drivers/net and
xen-blkback under d
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 14:31 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> - move module to appropriate location in kernel tree
> >
> > drivers/xen/ is the correct location for this driver.
>
> Hmm, so you regard placement of xen-netback under drivers/net and
> xen-blkback under drivers/block as wrong? I've jus
On 03/02/2015 12:39 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 26/02/15 13:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
Introduces the Xen pvUSB backend. With pvUSB it is possible for a Xen
domU to communicate with a USB device assigned to that domU. The
communication is all done via the pvUSB backend in a driver domain
(usually D
On 26/02/15 13:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Introduces the Xen pvUSB backend. With pvUSB it is possible for a Xen
> domU to communicate with a USB device assigned to that domU. The
> communication is all done via the pvUSB backend in a driver domain
> (usually Dom0) which is owner of the physical dev
15 matches
Mail list logo
