On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 09:27:08AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 15:38 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:43:54PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > But stepping back how/why is this function called on x86 when not
> > > running under Xen? Wouldn't
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 15:38 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:43:54PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > But stepping back how/why is this function called on x86 when not
> > running under Xen? Wouldn't the use have to be using console=hvc or
> > earlyprintk=xen or someth
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:43:54PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 17:30 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> > I'm sure the solution "move xen call earlier" will come up in few mails,
> > so there was a discussion for swiotlb few weeks ago
> > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/29/609).
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 17:30 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> I'm sure the solution "move xen call earlier" will come up in few mails,
> so there was a discussion for swiotlb few weeks ago
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/29/609). And the final decision was to
> avoid specific Xen call in arch_setup.
On 10/24/2013 03:49 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:08:01PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
On 10/23/2013 05:15 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 09:52:40PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Actually, I looked closer the code, with the new solution
xe
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:08:01PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 10/23/2013 05:15 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 09:52:40PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> >>On 09/30/2013 03:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:49:37PM +0100, Julien
On 10/23/2013 05:15 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 09:52:40PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
On 09/30/2013 03:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:49:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
On 09/27/2013 10:25 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
@@ -641
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 09:52:40PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 09/30/2013 03:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:49:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> >>On 09/27/2013 10:25 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>
> >>>@@ -641,7 +641,20 @@ struct console xenboot_consol
On 09/30/2013 03:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:49:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
On 09/27/2013 10:25 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
@@ -641,7 +641,20 @@ struct console xenboot_console = {
void xen_raw_console_write(const char *str)
{
- dom0_write_
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:49:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 10:25 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>
> >@@ -641,7 +641,20 @@ struct console xenboot_console = {
> >
> > void xen_raw_console_write(const char *str)
> > {
> >-dom0_write_console(0, str, strlen(str));
> >+ssi
On 09/27/2013 10:25 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
@@ -641,7 +641,20 @@ struct console xenboot_console = {
void xen_raw_console_write(const char *str)
{
- dom0_write_console(0, str, strlen(str));
+ ssize_t len = strlen(str);
+ int rc = 0;
+
+ if (xen_domain()) {
+
11 matches
Mail list logo
