Re: [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing

2015-04-27 Thread Suravee Suthikulpanit
On 04/27/2015 03:38 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Sunday, April 26, 2015 10:45:29 PM Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote: On 4/24/15, 21:28, "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: On Friday, April 24, 2015 04:08:31 PM Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: On 4/16/15 20:45, Zheng, Lv wrote: Before back porting this

Re: [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing

2015-04-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sunday, April 26, 2015 10:45:29 PM Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote: > On 4/24/15, 21:28, "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > >On Friday, April 24, 2015 04:08:31 PM Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > >> On 4/16/15 20:45, Zheng, Lv wrote: > >> > Before back porting this to ACPICA, let me ask one simple ques

Re: [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing

2015-04-26 Thread Suthikulpanit, Suravee
On 4/24/15, 21:28, "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: >On Friday, April 24, 2015 04:08:31 PM Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: >> On 4/16/15 20:45, Zheng, Lv wrote: >> > Before back porting this to ACPICA, let me ask one simple question. >> > According to the spec, the _CLS is optional and PCI specific. >> >

Re: [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing

2015-04-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, April 24, 2015 04:08:31 PM Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > On 4/16/15 20:45, Zheng, Lv wrote: > > Before back porting this to ACPICA, let me ask one simple question. > > According to the spec, the _CLS is optional and PCI specific. > > So why should we implement it in ACPICA core not OSPM

Re: [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing

2015-04-24 Thread Suravee Suthikulpanit
On 4/16/15 20:45, Zheng, Lv wrote: Before back porting this to ACPICA, let me ask one simple question. According to the spec, the _CLS is optional and PCI specific. So why should we implement it in ACPICA core not OSPM specific modules? If this need to be implemented in ACPICA, then what about th

RE: [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing

2015-04-16 Thread Moore, Robert
org > Subject: RE: [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing > > Before back porting this to ACPICA, let me ask one simple question. > According to the spec, the _CLS is optional and PCI specific. > So why should we implement it in ACPICA core not OSPM specific modules? >

RE: [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing

2015-04-16 Thread Zheng, Lv
Before back porting this to ACPICA, let me ask one simple question. According to the spec, the _CLS is optional and PCI specific. So why should we implement it in ACPICA core not OSPM specific modules? If this need to be implemented in ACPICA, then what about the following device identification ob

Re: [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing

2015-04-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, March 30, 2015 04:56:17 PM Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > ACPI Device configuration often contain _CLS object to suppy PCI-defined > class code for the device. This patch introduces logic to process the _CLS > object. > > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg > Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo > Signed-of

[V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing

2015-03-30 Thread Suravee Suthikulpanit
ACPI Device configuration often contain _CLS object to suppy PCI-defined class code for the device. This patch introduces logic to process the _CLS object. Acked-by: Mika Westerberg Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit --- drivers/acpi/acpica/acutils.h | 3 ++ drivers