On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 02:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > > > Bryan Wu wrote:
> > > > >>> but mremap doesn't -- there's even an impl
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 02:44 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > > Bryan Wu wrote:
> > > >>> but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
> > > >>> Could you check the re
On 9/14/07, Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > Bryan Wu wrote:
> > >>> but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
> > >>> Could you check the rest of these over to see if they truly don't need
> > >>> to be impl
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 13:03 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Bryan Wu wrote:
> >>> but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
> >>> Could you check the rest of these over to see if they truly don't need
> >>> to be implemented for no-mmu?
> >> you're right we want mremap, my f
Bryan Wu wrote:
but mremap doesn't -- there's even an implementation in mm/nommu.c.
Could you check the rest of these over to see if they truly don't need
to be implemented for no-mmu?
you're right we want mremap, my fault
Yes, I do think so, both sys_mremap and sys_munmap are implemented in
5 matches
Mail list logo
