Re: [TOMOYO #5 02/18] Add wrapper functions for VFShelperfunctions.

2007-11-16 Thread Tetsuo Handa
Hello. Trond Myklebust wrote: > I'm confused. How do you tell the difference between a 'userland' > request and a 'kernel' request, and why is the latter safe from a > security perspective? For example, if userland process wants to create a directory, it will call mkdir(2). In the kernel, mkdir(2)

Re: [TOMOYO #5 02/18] Add wrapper functions for VFShelperfunctions.

2007-11-16 Thread Trond Myklebust
On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 13:04 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Hello. > > Trond Myklebust wrote: > > The problem is that you have thrown away the main tool for documenting > > the requirement, and for enforcing correctness (i.e. function argument > > checking by the compiler). > I'm sorry. I wanted to

Re: [TOMOYO #5 02/18] Add wrapper functions for VFShelperfunctions.

2007-11-16 Thread Tetsuo Handa
Hello. Trond Myklebust wrote: > The problem is that you have thrown away the main tool for documenting > the requirement, and for enforcing correctness (i.e. function argument > checking by the compiler). I'm sorry. I wanted to know whether the below approach is possible. > The old functions are