On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 01:18:42AM +0200, Martin Clausen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:22:15AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> > Also, what is a good rock solid SCSI RAID controller? Money is
> > no object. Reliability, performance and Linux compatibility are
> > though.
>
> I have very go
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:22:15AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Also, what is a good rock solid SCSI RAID controller? Money is
> no object. Reliability, performance and Linux compatibility are
> though.
I have very good experiences with the Mylex controllers/drivers!
But then again I also h
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:18:57PM +0300, Ville Herva wrote:
> > There's also AthlonLinux http://athlonlinux.org/ and AthlonGCC
> > http://athlonlinux.org/agcc/about.shtml, but I have no experience with those
> > (I have no Athlon ;( ).
>
> A warning a
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:18:57PM +0300, Ville Herva wrote:
> There's also AthlonLinux http://athlonlinux.org/ and AthlonGCC
> http://athlonlinux.org/agcc/about.shtml, but I have no experience with those
> (I have no Athlon ;( ).
A warning about agcc, I've discovered that it does not always comp
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:33:00AM -0400, you [Tom Leete] claimed:
>
> The build problen with Athlon+SMP was solved by AA's patch. I had tested a
> similar patch on UP over 2.4.0-test and previous 2.4 releases with nary a
> problem.
>
> This may be too experimental for your purposes, but FWIW I'm
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> Would the current state of athlon support be considered stable?
> I've got a colleague interested in getting a dual athlon box, and
> I'll be making the decision as to what hardware to purchase. I'm
> wondering is dual Athlon viable for a business solution right
> now
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:03:18AM +0200, Antwerpen, Oliver wrote:
> > I am also highly interested in information about dual Athlon (which
> > kernel/compiler/tools to use?), as we will get a dual Athlon sample before
>
> kernel >= 2.4.3 (better >= 2.4.4pre2 for other
Moin Andrea,
> From: Andrea Arcangeli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:03:18AM +0200, Antwerpen, Oliver wrote:
> > I am also highly interested in information about dual Athlon (which
> > kernel/compiler/tools to use?), as we will get a dual
> Athlon sample before
>
> k
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:03:18AM +0200, Antwerpen, Oliver wrote:
> I am also highly interested in information about dual Athlon (which
> kernel/compiler/tools to use?), as we will get a dual Athlon sample before
kernel >= 2.4.3 (better >= 2.4.4pre2 for other rasons) compiled for K7 and
CONFIG_S
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:22:15AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Would the current state of athlon support be considered stable?
yes.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vge
Moin Mike,
> From: Mike A. Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Would the current state of athlon support be considered stable?
> I've got a colleague interested in getting a dual athlon box, and
> I'll be making the decision as to what hardware to purchase. I'm
> wondering is dual Athlon viab
Would the current state of athlon support be considered stable?
I've got a colleague interested in getting a dual athlon box, and
I'll be making the decision as to what hardware to purchase. I'm
wondering is dual Athlon viable for a business solution right
now, or is it considered "experimental"?
12 matches
Mail list logo
