Re: [Request for review] Revised delete_module(2) manual page

2012-10-24 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Lucas, On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) > wrote: >> Ping! >> >> Rusty (et al.) I'm pretty sure the new page text is okay, but I would >> like someone knowledgeable to confirm. > > One more thi

Re: [Request for review] Revised delete_module(2) manual page

2012-10-24 Thread Rusty Russell
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes: > Ping! > > Rusty (et al.) I'm pretty sure the new page text is okay, but I would > like someone knowledgeable to confirm. Yes, sorry, I did read it, and had nothing to add. Ack, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kern

Re: [Request for review] Revised delete_module(2) manual page

2012-10-23 Thread Lucas De Marchi
Hi Michael, On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Ping! > > Rusty (et al.) I'm pretty sure the new page text is okay, but I would > like someone knowledgeable to confirm. One more thing: > .SH "SEE ALSO" > .BR create_module (2), > .BR init_module (2), > .BR quer

Re: [Request for review] Revised delete_module(2) manual page

2012-10-21 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Ping! Rusty (et al.) I'm pretty sure the new page text is okay, but I would like someone knowledgeable to confirm. Thanks, Michael -- Forwarded message -- From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) Date: Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:47 AM Subject: Re: [Request for review] Re

Re: [Request for review] Revised delete_module(2) manual page

2012-10-12 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Rusty, Thanks for taking a look at this page. In the light of your comments, I've substantially reworked the page, and further review would not go amiss, in case I made a misstep along the way. On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Rusty Russell wrote: > "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes: > >>

Re: [Request for review] Revised delete_module(2) manual page

2012-10-11 Thread Rusty Russell
Lucas De Marchi writes: > What do you think? Mark as deprecated now and remove when kernel > removes it? Or remove now? Complain now, and I'll queue the removal in two merge windows. Thats gives us a chance just in case someone actually uses this; if so I want to talk to them about what it is th

Re: [Request for review] Revised delete_module(2) manual page

2012-10-11 Thread Lucas De Marchi
Hi, On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Rusty Russell wrote: > "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes: > >> Hello Kees, Rusty, >> >> The current delete_module(2) page is severely out of date (basically, >> its content corresponds to 2.4 days, and was even pretty thin in >> covering that). So, I took

Re: [Request for review] Revised delete_module(2) manual page

2012-10-10 Thread Rusty Russell
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes: > Hello Kees, Rusty, > > The current delete_module(2) page is severely out of date (basically, > its content corresponds to 2.4 days, and was even pretty thin in > covering that). So, I took a shot at revising the page to Linux 2.6+ > reality. Would it be pos