Hi Peter.
Wasn't 2.2.12 the kernel that included the `lock halt` bug patch?
>>> Perhaps, but is has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of
>>> this discussion.
>> The `lock halt` bug patch was specific to the Cyrix processors
>> (not to be confused with the `lock registers` patch f
Hi Peter.
>> Wasn't 2.2.12 the kernel that included the `lock halt` bug patch?
> Perhaps, but is has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of
> this discussion.
The `lock halt` bug patch was specific to the Cyrix processors (not to
be confused with the `lock registers` patch for the Intel p
Hi HPA.
>> Some time ago I installed Linux (Redhat 6.0) on my pc (Cx486 8M
>> RAM) and gcc had a lot of signal 11 (a couple every hour) I was
>> upgrading the kernel every time there was a new kernel and from
>> 2.2.12(or 14) no more signal 11 (very rare) Is this still a
>> hardware problem
3 matches
Mail list logo
