On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 01:46:18PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/18/2014 01:33 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:56:03AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 06/18/2014 05:14 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
> >>>
> >>> We have to consid
On 06/18/2014 01:33 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:56:03AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/18/2014 05:14 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>>>
>>> We have to consider alignment for the ring buffer both for the
>>> default static size, and t
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:56:03AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/18/2014 05:14 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
> >
> > We have to consider alignment for the ring buffer both for the
> > default static size, and then also for when an dynamic allocation
> > is made
On 06/18/2014 05:14 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>
> We have to consider alignment for the ring buffer both for the
> default static size, and then also for when an dynamic allocation
> is made when the log_buf_len=n kernel parameter is passed to set
> the size specifi
On Wed 2014-06-18 04:14:24, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>
> We have to consider alignment for the ring buffer both for the
> default static size, and then also for when an dynamic allocation
> is made when the log_buf_len=n kernel parameter is passed to set
> the size spe
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
We have to consider alignment for the ring buffer both for the
default static size, and then also for when an dynamic allocation
is made when the log_buf_len=n kernel parameter is passed to set
the size specifically to a size larger than the default size set
by the archi
6 matches
Mail list logo
