On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 01:55:37PM -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
> For architectures whose maintainers aren't worried and whose
> developers/users aren't bothered enough to submit an inline assembly
> patch, I'll just keep the inlines with the *(volatile foo *)& casts,
> unless of course ISO clarifi
In the fallout from the recent atomic_t volatility discussions, patches
have been posted to moot the compiler correctness issues by implementing
atomic[64]_[read|set] in inline assembly on powerpc, i386, and x86_64.
While I personally don't consider such implementations to be critically
necessa
2 matches
Mail list logo
