On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 09:27:28AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> BTW: This limitations needs to be clearly documented somewhere.
> Usually an user thinks that only she can access encrypted files...
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
For what it's worth, I've been making a few updates to the public d
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Thanks for your quick response!
> I hoped you had already some code, but having a decent design document
> is also nice. I'm eager to read it.
To be clear, the design document which Joe is working on is only
addressing a new way
Eric,
On 30.11.2016 01:04, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>
>> Do you also plan to address d/page cache related issues?
>> i.e. when two users are logged into the system user rw
>> is able to see decrypted file names and contents in /home
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> Do you also plan to address d/page cache related issues?
> i.e. when two users are logged into the system user rw
> is able to see decrypted file names and contents in /home/dags/
> if user dags installs a key and accessed a f
Joe,
On 29.11.2016 22:42, Joe Richey wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I'm Joe Richey, and I work on Mike's team. We've been playing around
> with a few design
> ideas regarding a tool for managing filesystem encryption. After going
> though some iterations
> with Ted, we have a fairly good idea about whe
Hi Richard,
I'm Joe Richey, and I work on Mike's team. We've been playing around
with a few design
ideas regarding a tool for managing filesystem encryption. After going
though some iterations
with Ted, we have a fairly good idea about where to head design wise,
and I'm working on a
design documen
Michael,
On 19.10.2016 19:36, Michael Halcrow wrote:
>> That said, what about implementing such a tool as part of util-linux to
>> control
>> fscrypto? We (David and I) would volunteer.
>
> While discussing several changes we have staged for release (we're
> trying to minimize churn by batching
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:49:37PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> > That said, what about implementing such a tool as part of util-linux to
> > control
> > fscrypto? We (David and I) would volunteer.
>
> I have nothing against this plan (add to util-linux) if ext4, f2fs and
> ubifs guys agree too.
Ou
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 01:35:54PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since file level encryption has more than one user, currently ext4, f2fs and
> soon ubifs
> it would be nice to have a single tool to control fscrypto from userspace.
>
> For ext4 we have already at least two tools, on
Michael,
On 19.10.2016 19:36, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Since file level encryption has more than one user, currently ext4, f2fs and
>> soon ubifs
>> it would be nice to have a single tool to control fscrypto from userspace.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since file level encryption has more than one user, currently ext4, f2fs and
> soon ubifs
> it would be nice to have a single tool to control fscrypto from userspace.
>
> For ext4 we have already at least two tools, one as part
Hi!
Since file level encryption has more than one user, currently ext4, f2fs and
soon ubifs
it would be nice to have a single tool to control fscrypto from userspace.
For ext4 we have already at least two tools, one as part of e2fsprogs and
another
one on github[0]. IMHO the latter one is much
12 matches
Mail list logo
