On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 06:35:50PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 05:59:55PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:16:40AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > - ILP32 VDSO code excluded. It's not mandatory, and caused questions
> > >during review process.
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 05:59:55PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:16:40AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > - ILP32 VDSO code excluded. It's not mandatory, and caused questions
> >during review process. We definitely make sure we will follow up
> >with a VDSO later o
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:16:40AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> - ILP32 VDSO code excluded. It's not mandatory, and caused questions
>during review process. We definitely make sure we will follow up
>with a VDSO later on because it is needed for performance reasons;
I already asked in one o
Yury Norov writes:
> v6:
> - time_t, __kenel_off_t and other types turned to be 32-bit
>for compatibility reasons (after v5 discussion);
> - related changes applied to ILP32 syscall table and handlers;
> - ILP32 VDSO code excluded. It's not mandatory, and caused questions
>during revie
Hi, Yury
Glad to see the new version of ilp32. Here is some general questions:
On 2015/11/18 5:16, Yury Norov wrote:
> --8<-
> Colleagues, I'm gonna to send it to list.
> Please, take a look.
> --8<-
>
> This is still RFC because ~20 tests still fail,
> and because it's based on
--8<-
Colleagues, I'm gonna to send it to list.
Please, take a look.
--8<-
This is still RFC because ~20 tests still fail,
and because it's based on 4.3 kernel version, and
some work is needed to rebase on 4.4. I'd preffer
to do it later.
v3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/3/704
v4
6 matches
Mail list logo
