On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 03:35:45PM -0500, J. Agustín Vega-Frías wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > I'm mostly ok with this approach, but I have a concern with the way in which
> > the sysfs interface for carving up the config fields is implemented. If this
> > is int
Hi Will,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
[snip]
> I'm mostly ok with this approach, but I have a concern with the way in which
> the sysfs interface for carving up the config fields is implemented. If this
> is intended to be a strict extension to the armv8 pmu architecture
Hi Agustin,
On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 04:23:17PM -0400, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
> This series is a complete re-design of V1 of the QCOM Falkor extensions [1],
> it introduces a probe table based on the HID of a device nested under the CPU
> device to allow variant detection and arm_pmu customizati
This series is a complete re-design of V1 of the QCOM Falkor extensions [1],
it introduces a probe table based on the HID of a device nested under the CPU
device to allow variant detection and arm_pmu customization.
The first patch adds an additional section at the end of each ACPI probe table.
Th
4 matches
Mail list logo
