RE: [RFC V2] DA9210 driver files

2013-07-15 Thread Steve Twiss
>On 02 July 2013 22:06, Mark Brown wrote: >>On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 03:10:28PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote: > >> The use of regmap_range is not being considered because I am not >> intending to use PAGE_CON register page selection in any of the driver >> development. > >Makes sense to map things in

RE: [RFC V2] DA9210 driver files

2013-07-03 Thread Opensource [Steve Twiss]
On 02 July 2013 @ 22:06, Mark Brown wrote: >Please follow the patch submission process in SubmittingPatches. This doesn't >visually >resemble most patch submissions... Will follow the rules more closely in future. >> >This looks like you should be using a regmap range. > >> The use of regmap_

Re: [RFC V2] DA9210 driver files

2013-07-02 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 03:10:28PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote: > From: Steve Twiss > > This is the regulator driver for the Dialog DA9210 Multi-phase Buck. > The patch is relative to linux-next next-20130701 > and this is RFC attempt number 2 Please follow the patch submission process in Submittin

[RFC V2] DA9210 driver files

2013-07-01 Thread Steve Twiss
From: Steve Twiss This is the regulator driver for the Dialog DA9210 Multi-phase Buck. The patch is relative to linux-next next-20130701 and this is RFC attempt number 2 The main changes the previous RFC number 1 are as follows: (1) Kconfig - Entry for REGULATOR_DA9210 has now been correctly