Re: [RFC Patch 09/19] ACPI: Fix a bug in parsing ACPI Memroy24 resource

2015-01-20 Thread Jiang Liu
On 2015/1/21 10:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 10:15:01 AM Jiang Liu wrote: >> On 2015/1/21 8:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:32:56 AM Jiang Liu wrote: According to ACPI spec 5, section 6.4.3.1 "24-Bit Memory Range Descriptor", >

Re: [RFC Patch 09/19] ACPI: Fix a bug in parsing ACPI Memroy24 resource

2015-01-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 10:15:01 AM Jiang Liu wrote: > On 2015/1/21 8:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:32:56 AM Jiang Liu wrote: > >> According to ACPI spec 5, section 6.4.3.1 "24-Bit Memory Range Descriptor", > >> minimum, maximum and address_length field in

Re: [RFC Patch 09/19] ACPI: Fix a bug in parsing ACPI Memroy24 resource

2015-01-20 Thread Jiang Liu
On 2015/1/21 8:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:32:56 AM Jiang Liu wrote: >> According to ACPI spec 5, section 6.4.3.1 "24-Bit Memory Range Descriptor", >> minimum, maximum and address_length field in struct acpi_resource_memory24 >> is in granularity of 256-bytes. So

Re: [RFC Patch 09/19] ACPI: Fix a bug in parsing ACPI Memroy24 resource

2015-01-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:32:56 AM Jiang Liu wrote: > According to ACPI spec 5, section 6.4.3.1 "24-Bit Memory Range Descriptor", > minimum, maximum and address_length field in struct acpi_resource_memory24 > is in granularity of 256-bytes. So shift 8-bit left to get correct address. Are yo

[RFC Patch 09/19] ACPI: Fix a bug in parsing ACPI Memroy24 resource

2015-01-07 Thread Jiang Liu
According to ACPI spec 5, section 6.4.3.1 "24-Bit Memory Range Descriptor", minimum, maximum and address_length field in struct acpi_resource_memory24 is in granularity of 256-bytes. So shift 8-bit left to get correct address. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu --- drivers/acpi/resource.c |4 ++-- 1 f