Re: [RFC PATCH v9 0/7] Cavium ARM64 uncore PMU support

So what about the general idea with the wrapper, does this look sane? Any objections to that? thanks, Jan On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:12:31PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote: > I'm posting this as RFC following this discussion: > https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=150099526923838&w=2 > > I've imple

[RFC PATCH v9 0/7] Cavium ARM64 uncore PMU support

I'm posting this as RFC following this discussion: https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=150099526923838&w=2 I've implemented the wrapper for the PCI devices and put it under drivers/soc/cavium which I found more appropriate than drivers/misc. I was not able to find a way to build the EDAC driv