* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 09:45:47AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:52 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 08:42:40AM -0400, Kairui Song wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sure, the updated comments looks much better. Will the
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 09:45:47AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:52 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 08:42:40AM -0400, Kairui Song wrote:
> >
> > > Sure, the updated comments looks much better. Will the maintainer
> > > squash the comment upda
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:52 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 08:42:40AM -0400, Kairui Song wrote:
>
> > Sure, the updated comments looks much better. Will the maintainer
> > squash the comment update or should I send a V5?
>
> I've squashed it, I've just not gotten around to s
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 08:42:40AM -0400, Kairui Song wrote:
> Sure, the updated comments looks much better. Will the maintainer
> squash the comment update or should I send a V5?
I've squashed it, I've just not gotten around to stuffing it a git tree
yet. Should happen 'soon'.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 7:35 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:26:52AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> > Currently perf callchain doesn't work well with ORC unwinder
> > when sampling from trace point. We'll get useless in kernel callchain
> > like this:
> >
> > perf 6429 [000]
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:26:52AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> Currently perf callchain doesn't work well with ORC unwinder
> when sampling from trace point. We'll get useless in kernel callchain
> like this:
>
> perf 6429 [000]22.498450: kmem:mm_page_alloc: page=0x176a17
> pfn=1
Currently perf callchain doesn't work well with ORC unwinder
when sampling from trace point. We'll get useless in kernel callchain
like this:
perf 6429 [000]22.498450: kmem:mm_page_alloc: page=0x176a17
pfn=1534487 order=0 migratetype=0 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL
be23e32e __
7 matches
Mail list logo
