Hi SeongJae,
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:03:09 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:53:03 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:01:04 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
> [...]
> > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:32:23 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:02:23
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:53:03 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:01:04 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
[...]
> > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:32:23 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:02:23 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
[...]
> >
> > I would like to hear how you think about t
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 21:01:04 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
> Hi SeongJae,
>
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:32:23 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:02:23 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
[...]
> > > > Honggyu joined DAMON Beer/Coffee/Tea Chat[1] yesterday, and we
> > > > discussed about
> > >
Hi SeongJae,
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:32:23 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:02:23 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
>
> > Hi SeongJae,
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:51:20 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 23:05:46 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > > There was
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:27:34 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
[...]
> OK. It could be a matter of preference and the current filter is already
> in the mainline so I won't insist more.
Thank you for accepting my humble suggestion.
[...]
> > I'd prefer improving the documents or
> > user-space tool and
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:02:23 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
> Hi SeongJae,
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:51:20 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 23:05:46 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
> >
> > > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
> > > posted at [1].
> >
Hi SeongJae,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:51:20 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 23:05:46 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
>
> > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
> > posted at [1].
> >
> > It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS a
gt; > > so
> > > > > > please read the inline comments again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2024 08:53:00 -0800 SeongJae Park
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi Honggyu,
> > > > > > >
> > Hi Honggyu,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-
> > > > > > > > From: SeongJae Park
> > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 3:33 AM
> > > > > >
ain.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2024 08:53:00 -0800 SeongJae Park
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi Honggyu,
> > > > >
> > > > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > > > From: SeongJae Park
>
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > > From: SeongJae Park
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 3:33 AM
> > > > > > To: Honggyu Kim
> > > > > > Cc: SeongJae Park ; kernel_team
> > > > > >
Hi SeongJae,
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:13:57 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:31:44 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
>
> > Hi Honggyu,
> >
> > On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 17:36:29 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
> >
> > > Hi SeongJae,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the confirmation. I have a few commen
3:33 AM
> > > > > To: Honggyu Kim
> > > > > Cc: SeongJae Park ; kernel_team
> > > > >
> > > > > Subject: RE: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] DAMON based 2-tier memory
> > > > > management for CXL memory
> > > > >
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:31:44 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hi Honggyu,
>
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 17:36:29 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
>
> > Hi SeongJae,
> >
> > Thanks for the confirmation. I have a few comments on young filter so
> > please read the inline comments again.
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Mar
te:
> > Hi Honggyu,
> >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: SeongJae Park
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 3:33 AM
> > > > To: Honggyu Kim
> > > > Cc: SeongJae Park ; kernel_team
> > > >
> > > > S
; Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 3:33 AM
> > > To: Honggyu Kim
> > > Cc: SeongJae Park ; kernel_team
> > > Subject: RE: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] DAMON based 2-tier memory management
> > > for CXL memory
> > >
> > > Hi Honggyu,
> > >
> &
Hi SeongJae,
I couldn't send email to LKML properly due to internal system issues,
but it's better now so I will be able to communicate better.
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 19:05:50 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:51:20 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 Feb
Hello,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:51:20 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 23:05:46 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
>
> > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
> > posted at [1].
> >
> > It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS action
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 23:05:46 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
> There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
> posted at [1].
>
> It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS action
> are made. This RFC is about its implementation for physical address
> spac
There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
posted at [1].
It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS action
are made. This RFC is about its implementation for physical address
space.
Introduction
With the advent of CXL/PCIe attached
20 matches
Mail list logo
